2000 Lotus M250 vs. 2012 Ford Flex

To start off, 2012 Ford Flex is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus M250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus M250 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2000 Lotus M250. (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus M250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Flex weights approximately 1353 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Lotus M250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus M250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Flex (336 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250. 2012 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 2000 Lotus M250 has manual transmission. 2000 Lotus M250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: