2000 Lotus M250 vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus M250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus M250 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2013 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2000 Lotus M250. (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus M250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 711 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lotus Evora (350 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 2013 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Lotus M250 | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
| Make | Lotus | Lotus |
| Model | M250 | Evora |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 176 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2047 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1229 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2575 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |
