2000 Mahindra Armada vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2000 Mahindra Armada is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (118 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 650 kg more than 1963 Pontiac Tempest.
Because 2000 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mahindra Armada | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Mahindra | Pontiac |
| Model | Armada | Tempest |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5160 mm |
