2000 Mahindra Armada vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2000 Mahindra Armada is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Toyota Corona (83 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1964 Toyota Corona.
Because 2000 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Toyota Corona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mahindra Armada | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Corona |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1453 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4500 mm |
