2000 Mahindra Armada vs. 1964 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2000 Mahindra Armada is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Corona. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1964 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Toyota Corona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mahindra Armada | 1964 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Corona |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4000 mm |
