2000 Mahindra Armada vs. 1965 Pontiac Catalina

To start off, 2000 Mahindra Armada is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Pontiac Catalina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Pontiac Catalina would be higher. At 6,891 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Pontiac Catalina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Pontiac Catalina (376 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Pontiac Catalina should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 115 kg more than 1965 Pontiac Catalina.

Because 2000 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Pontiac Catalina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1965 Pontiac Catalina has automatic transmission and 2000 Mahindra Armada has manual transmission. 2000 Mahindra Armada will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Pontiac Catalina will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: