2000 Mahindra Armada vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2006 Holden Epica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra Armada.
Because 2000 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mahindra Armada | 2006 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mahindra | Holden |
| Model | Armada | Epica |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4805 mm |
