2000 Mahindra Bolero vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 2000 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volvo 240 (81 HP @ 4650 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra Bolero. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 410 kg more than 1983 Volvo 240.
Because 2000 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mahindra Bolero (166 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 240. (139 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Mahindra Bolero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mahindra Bolero | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
| Make | Mahindra | Volvo |
| Model | Bolero | 240 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 2523 cc | 2315 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4650 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1780 kg | 1370 kg |
