2000 Mahindra CL vs. 1962 Volvo 120
To start off, 2000 Mahindra CL is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Volvo 120 (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Volvo 120 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra CL weights approximately 290 kg more than 1962 Volvo 120.
Because 2000 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Volvo 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 120. (142 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mahindra CL | 1962 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Mahindra | Volvo |
Model | CL | 120 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2522 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |