2000 Mahindra CL vs. 1968 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2000 Mahindra CL is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Toyota Crown (108 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Toyota Crown should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra CL weights approximately 40 kg more than 1968 Toyota Crown.
Because 2000 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Toyota Crown. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Toyota Crown. (157 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mahindra CL | 1968 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
Model | CL | Crown |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2522 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |