2000 Mahindra CL vs. 1976 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Mahindra CL is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Toyota Celica (78 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra CL weights approximately 330 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 2000 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Celica. (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2000 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mahindra CL | 1976 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
Model | CL | Celica |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2522 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2430 mm |