2000 Mahindra CL vs. 1981 Mazda 929
To start off, 2000 Mahindra CL is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda 929 (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra CL weights approximately 150 kg more than 1981 Mazda 929.
Because 2000 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Mazda 929. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mahindra CL | 1981 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Mahindra | Mazda |
Model | CL | 929 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2522 cc | 1969 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2620 mm |