2000 Mahindra CL vs. 1983 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2000 Mahindra CL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda RX-7 (105 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra CL weights approximately 240 kg more than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2000 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda RX-7. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mahindra CL | 1983 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Mahindra | Mazda |
Model | CL | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2522 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2430 mm |