2000 Mahindra CL vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mahindra CL is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mazda 626 (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra CL weights approximately 16 kg more than 1992 Mazda 626.
Because 2000 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mazda 626 (221 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1992 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mahindra CL | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Mahindra | Mazda |
| Model | CL | 626 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2522 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1284 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2620 mm |
