2000 Mahindra CL vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mahindra CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mahindra CL would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Matrix (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2000 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mahindra CL | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
Model | CL | Matrix |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2522 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |