2000 Mahindra CL vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mahindra CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mahindra CL would be higher. At 2,522 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 2 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra CL weights approximately 200 kg more than 2011 Mazda 2.
Because 2000 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Mazda 2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 2 (205 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mahindra CL | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Mahindra | Mazda |
Model | CL | 2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2522 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2489 mm |