2000 Mahindra Commander vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 2000 Mahindra Commander is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 2,112 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mahindra Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Volvo 120 (67 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra Commander. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Volvo 120 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mahindra Commander weights approximately 360 kg more than 1964 Volvo 120.
Because 2000 Mahindra Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Volvo 120. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 120 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mahindra Commander. (123 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1964 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mahindra Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mahindra Commander | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Mahindra | Volvo |
Model | Commander | 120 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2112 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2610 mm |