2000 Marcos Mantara vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Marcos Mantara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Marcos Mantara would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (235 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2000 Marcos Mantara. (182 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2000 Marcos Mantara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1010 kg more than 2000 Marcos Mantara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (408 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Marcos Mantara. (313 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Marcos Mantara.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Marcos Mantara | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Marcos | Jeep |
Model | Mantara | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3948 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 182 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 313 Nm | 408 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1770 mm |