2000 Marcos Mantis vs. 1986 Plymouth Voyager
To start off, 2000 Marcos Mantis is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Plymouth Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Plymouth Voyager would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Plymouth Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Marcos Mantis | 1986 Plymouth Voyager | |
| Make | Marcos | Plymouth |
| Model | Mantis | Voyager |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 506 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2860 mm |
