2000 Marcos Mantis vs. 1996 Renault Megane
To start off, 2000 Marcos Mantis is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 405 more horse power than 1996 Renault Megane. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Megane.
Because 2000 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Marcos Mantis (613 Nm) has 412 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault Megane. (201 Nm). This means 2000 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Marcos Mantis | 1996 Renault Megane | |
Make | Marcos | Renault |
Model | Mantis | Megane |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 506 HP | 101 HP |
Torque | 613 Nm | 201 Nm |
Top Speed | 283 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2680 mm |