2000 Marcos Mantis vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Marcos Mantis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Marcos Mantis would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 433 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio.
Because 2000 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Marcos Mantis (613 Nm) has 508 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 2000 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Marcos Mantis | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Marcos | Renault |
| Model | Mantis | Clio |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1149 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 506 HP | 73 HP |
| Torque | 613 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2740 mm |
