2000 Marcos Mantis vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Marcos Mantis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Marcos Mantis would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 402 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 2000 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Marcos Mantis (613 Nm) has 468 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Marcos Mantis | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Marcos | Mazda |
Model | Mantis | 6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 506 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 613 Nm | 145 Nm |
Top Speed | 283 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1020 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2610 mm |