2000 Matra-Simca M72 vs. 1971 Zastava 1300

To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 1300 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1971 Zastava 1300 (53 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 1971 Zastava 1300 has manual transmission. 1971 Zastava 1300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: