2000 Matra-Simca M72 vs. 1974 Mini MK III
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mini MK III would be higher. In terms of performance, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 (50 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1974 Mini MK III. (34 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mini MK III.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Mini MK III, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 1974 Mini MK III has manual transmission. 1974 Mini MK III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Matra-Simca M72 | 1974 Mini MK III | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Mini |
Model | M72 | MK III |
Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 34 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |