2000 Matra-Simca M72 vs. 1995 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda MX-3 (106 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 1995 Mazda MX-3 has manual transmission. 1995 Mazda MX-3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Matra-Simca M72 | 1995 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Mazda |
Model | M72 | MX-3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 106 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |