2000 Matra-Simca M72 vs. 1998 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Toyota Sienna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Toyota Sienna would be higher. In terms of performance, 1998 Toyota Sienna (189 HP) has 139 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Sienna should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | 1998 Toyota Sienna | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Toyota |
| Model | M72 | Sienna |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 189 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
