2000 Matra-Simca M72 vs. 1999 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercury Cougar would be higher. In terms of performance, 1999 Mercury Cougar (168 HP) has 118 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mercury Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Matra-Simca M72 | 1999 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Mercury |
Model | M72 | Cougar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 168 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |