2000 Matra-Simca M72 vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | 1999 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Mitsubishi |
| Model | M72 | Space Runner |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
