2000 Matra-Simca M72 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Zo (74 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Zo should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Renault |
| Model | M72 | Zo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
