2000 Matra-Simca M72 vs. 2001 Saturn SC
To start off, 2001 Saturn SC is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Matra-Simca M72. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Matra-Simca M72 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2001 Saturn SC (100 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Saturn SC should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Saturn SC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 2001 Saturn SC has manual transmission. 2001 Saturn SC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Matra-Simca M72 | 2001 Saturn SC | |
Make | Matra-Simca | Saturn |
Model | M72 | SC |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Horse Power | 50 HP | 100 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |