2000 Matra-Simca M72 vs. 2003 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Matra-Simca M72. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Matra-Simca M72 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Tribute (122 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 2003 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 has automatic transmission and 2003 Mazda Tribute has manual transmission. 2003 Mazda Tribute will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Matra-Simca M72 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | 2003 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Mazda |
| Model | M72 | Tribute |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 122 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
