2000 Matra-Simca M72 vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Matra-Simca M72. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Matra-Simca M72 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S60 (161 HP) has 111 more horse power than 2000 Matra-Simca M72. (50 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2000 Matra-Simca M72.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Matra-Simca | Volvo |
| Model | M72 | S60 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 161 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
