2000 Mazda 121 vs. 2005 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2005 Smart Roadster is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 121 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Smart Roadster (100 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 121. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 121.
Because 2005 Smart Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Smart Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Smart Roadster (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 121. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Smart Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda 121 | 2005 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Mazda | Smart |
Model | 121 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2370 mm |