2000 Mazda 323 vs. 2009 Volvo C30

To start off, 2009 Volvo C30 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C30 (108 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 323. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 323.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C30 (240 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 323. (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 323. 2009 Volvo C30 has automatic transmission and 2000 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 2000 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo C30 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Mazda 323 2009 Volvo C30
Make Mazda Volvo
Model 323 C30
Year Released 2000 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1324 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 108 HP
Torque 109 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 18.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4210 mm 4260 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 70 L