2000 Mazda 323 vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 2 (100 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 323. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 323 weights approximately 101 kg more than 2012 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 2 (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 323. (109 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda 323 | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 323 | 2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 109 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1147 kg | 1046 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2489 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 43 L |