2000 Mazda 626 vs. 1964 Steyr 500
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Steyr 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Steyr 500 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 626 (100 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1964 Steyr 500. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1964 Steyr 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 906 kg more than 1964 Steyr 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Steyr 500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda 626 (392 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Steyr 500. (32 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Steyr 500.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda 626 | 1964 Steyr 500 | |
Make | Mazda | Steyr |
Model | 626 | 500 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 489 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 392 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1386 kg | 480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 2970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1850 mm |