2000 Mazda 626 vs. 1967 Morgan 4

To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 626 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1967 Morgan 4. (85 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1967 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 580 kg more than 1967 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Morgan 4. (135 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Morgan 4.

Compare all specifications: