2000 Mazda 626 vs. 1967 Seat 1500
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 626 (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1967 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1967 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1967 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda 626 | 1967 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | 626 | 1500 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1479 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2660 mm |