2000 Mazda 626 vs. 1991 Volvo 245
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Volvo 245. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Volvo 245 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Volvo 245 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda 626 (100 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1991 Volvo 245. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1991 Volvo 245.
Because 1991 Volvo 245 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Volvo 245. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda 626 (150 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Volvo 245. (143 Nm). This means 2000 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Volvo 245.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda 626 | 1991 Volvo 245 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 626 | 245 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 143 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2660 mm |