2000 Mazda 626 vs. 1999 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda B3000 (105 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 76 kg more than 1999 Mazda B3000.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda B3000 (198 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mazda 626. (150 Nm). This means 1999 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda 626 | 1999 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 626 | B3000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 2507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 198 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1164 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |