2000 Mazda AZ vs. 1963 Mitsubishi 500
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 656 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Mazda AZ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda AZ weights approximately 220 kg more than 1963 Mitsubishi 500.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Mitsubishi 500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mazda AZ | 1963 Mitsubishi 500 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | AZ | 500 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 23 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1400 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2070 mm |
