2000 Mazda AZ vs. 1975 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Datsun 260Z is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Datsun 260Z weights approximately 350 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Datsun 260Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1975 Datsun 260Z has automatic transmission and 2000 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2000 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1975 Datsun 260Z will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mazda AZ | 1975 Datsun 260Z | |
| Make | Mazda | Datsun |
| Model | AZ | 260Z |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 2565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4135 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2310 mm |
