2000 Mazda AZ vs. 1977 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Nissan 240 C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Nissan 240 C weights approximately 510 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Nissan 240 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda AZ | 1977 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | AZ | 240 C |
Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 656 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2700 mm |