2000 Mazda AZ vs. 1977 Volvo 164
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Volvo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mazda AZ | 1977 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | AZ | 164 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3350 mm |
