2000 Mazda AZ vs. 1986 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,041 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 20 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda AZ | 1986 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
Model | AZ | Polo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 656 cc | 1041 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2340 mm |