2000 Mazda AZ vs. 2009 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2009 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mercury Mountaineer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercury Mountaineer has automatic transmission and 2000 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2000 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercury Mountaineer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda AZ | 2009 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | AZ | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 656 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1880 mm |