2000 Mazda AZ vs. 2010 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2010 Kia Sedona is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Sedona weights approximately 1240 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Kia Sedona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Kia Sedona has automatic transmission and 2000 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2000 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Kia Sedona will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Mazda AZ | 2010 Kia Sedona | |
Make | Mazda | Kia |
Model | AZ | Sedona |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 656 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 244 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3020 mm |