2000 Mazda AZ vs. 2011 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2011 Smart ForTwo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2011 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 70 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Smart ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mazda AZ | 2011 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Mazda | Smart |
| Model | AZ | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 1867 mm |
