2000 Mazda AZ vs. 2013 Ford Escape
To start off, 2013 Ford Escape is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Escape weights approximately 848 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford Escape. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Ford Escape has automatic transmission and 2000 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2000 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford Escape will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mazda AZ | 2013 Ford Escape | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | AZ | Escape |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 166 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1598 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4524 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2078 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2690 mm |
