2000 Mazda AZ vs. 2013 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2013 Nissan Armada is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1902 kg more than 2000 Mazda AZ.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 2000 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2000 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Mazda AZ | 2013 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | AZ | Armada |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 656 cc | 5600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 313 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 2652 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5276 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 2014 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1981 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3130 mm |
